Emil Ruusuvuori vs Joel Popov Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L L L
Form
W L L L L W L L L WHead-2-Head: Ruusuvuori 1 - 0 Popov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ruusuvuori winning 2 and Popov winning 1. The last match between Ruusuvuori and Popov was at the Finland F2, 11-08-2014, Q1 round, Clay with Emil Ruusuvuori getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Emil Ruusuvuori | 1 |
| Joel Popov | 0 |
Finland F2(11-08-2014)
4
6
6
3
6
4
| Ruusuvuori | Stats | Popov |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (5-8) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 228 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 37 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 26 | Age | 28 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 10 | Titles | 0 |
| 61% (284-185) | Career Total W/L | 42% (10-14) |
| $2,614,675 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Putintseva VS Masarova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Ruusuvuori VS Popov H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Ruusuvuori VS Popov H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Emil Ruusuvuori Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Ilia Simakin
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hyeon Chung
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
49%
(
32 of
65)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
3
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve %
50%
(
15 of
30)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
93%
(
14 of
15)
1st Serve Won
87%
(
13 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25
Total Points Won
25
|
4-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Gauthier Onclin
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
6
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
6
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
4
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Borna Coric
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
10 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
54
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Matisse Bobichon
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
30%
(
6 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Emil Ruusuvuori
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Joel Popov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sam Taylor
Player
Joel Popov
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
2-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (284/185) | Win/Loss | 42% (10/14) |
| 58% (640/467) | Sets Win/Loss | 44% (24/31) |
| 53% (5643/4955) | Games Win/Loss | 45% (217/260) |
| 65% (120/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 47% (47/54) | Clay Win/Loss | 43% (10/13) |
| 67% (103/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (14/15) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.33 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 1725 | Aces Total | 2 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1372 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:34:15 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 355.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 237.29 |
| 65% (20022/30988) | 1st Serve % | 64% (81/127) |
| 71% (14199/20022) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (40/81) |
| 51% (5562/10966) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 42% (1304/3127) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 23% (3/13) |
| 40% (12746/31842) | Return Points Win % | 33% (35/107) |
| 39% (11/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (28/27) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (14/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (86/64) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (71/42) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/2) |
| 73% (74/28) | Futures W/L | 45% (10/12) |
| 62% (269/433) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 39% (11/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 53% (81/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 56% (74/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 89% (285/253) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 71% (14/10) |
| 11% (285/32) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 29% (14/4) |
| 16% (182/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (10/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
